United States v. King

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 17, 2005

Opinion

No. 04-8020

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (CR-02-402)

Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 17, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice Anthony King, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia N. Hawkins, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Maurice A. King appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for production of transcripts at government

expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis

on appeal, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. King, No. CR-02-402 (E.D. Va. Dec. 2, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

- 2 -