Dr. Jamshid Farshidi appeals the district court’s order awarding $5000 in attorney’s fees to Defendant, the prevailing party in this Title VII action. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k) (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion, and we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Farshidi v. Norfolk State Univ., No. CA-03-56-2 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 15, 2004; entered Nov. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED