Nigel MacCado appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See MacCado v. Kane, No. CA-04-479-AW (D.Md. Oct. 7, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED