Lloyd v. Vincent
Lloyd v. Vincent
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7715
TIMOTHY LLOYD, a/k/a Luxurious X,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BARTON VINCENT, Deputy General Counsel; JUDY C. ANDERSON, Director of Program Services; RICHARD E. SMITH, Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution; JOSEPH COUNTS, Associate Warden; HERB JOHNS, Institution Grievance Coordinator; DEBBIE N. MANESS, Mailroom Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-03-1546-4)
Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 16, 2005
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. William Benson Darwin, Jr., HOLCOMBE, BOMAR, GUNN & BRADFORD, PA, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Timothy Lloyd appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lloyd v.
Vincent, No. CA-03-1546-4 (D.S.C. Sept. 10, 2004). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished