U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Lloyd v. Vincent

Lloyd v. Vincent
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 16, 2005

Lloyd v. Vincent

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7715

TIMOTHY LLOYD, a/k/a Luxurious X, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BARTON VINCENT, Deputy General Counsel; JUDY C. ANDERSON, Director of Program Services; RICHARD E. SMITH, Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution; JOSEPH COUNTS, Associate Warden; HERB JOHNS, Institution Grievance Coordinator; DEBBIE N. MANESS, Mailroom Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-03-1546-4)

Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 16, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. William Benson Darwin, Jr., HOLCOMBE, BOMAR, GUNN & BRADFORD, PA, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM: Timothy Lloyd appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lloyd v. Vincent, No. CA-03-1546-4 (D.S.C. Sept. 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.