Johnson v. Fahey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Johnson v. Fahey, 121 F. App'x 537 (4th Cir. 2005)

Johnson v. Fahey

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Keith Tyrone Johnson, Curtis A. Nor-fleet, William R. Snyder, John Pittman, and Robert A. Ward appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Norfleet v. Fahey, CA-04-1075 (E.D.Va. Sept. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Keith Tyrone JOHNSON; Curtis A. Norfleet; William R. Snyder; John Pittman; Robert A. Ward, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Helen F. FAHEY; Virginia Parole Board Members, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished