U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Johnson v. Fahey

Johnson v. Fahey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 16, 2005 · Wilkinson, Michael, Shedd
121 F. App'x 537

Johnson v. Fahey

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Keith Tyrone Johnson, Curtis A. Nor-fleet, William R. Snyder, John Pittman, and Robert A. Ward appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Norfleet v. Fahey, CA-04-1075 (E.D.Va. Sept. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.