Powell v. West Virginia Department of Corrections
Opinion
Kenneth Powell appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Powell v. West Virginia Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-02-67-2 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Kenneth POWELL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Jim Rubenstein, Commissioner; William S. Haines, Warden; Jerry Haney, Inmate Movement; Randy Shreves, Unit Manager; Unknown Unit D Counselors, at the Time of the Incident; Michael Jackson, Unit Counselor, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished