Mitchell v. Lissi

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Mitchell v. Lissi

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7565

JAMAL MITCHELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VINCENT B. LISSI, individually, and in his official capacity as an agent or employee of the Federal Bureau of Investigations; JOHN C. BEVINGTON, individually, and in his official capacity as an agent or employee of the Federal Bureau of Investigations,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-1190-1)

Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 15, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamal Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Bernard Kernan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jamal Mitchell appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to Defendants in his action under

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Mitchell v. Lissi, No. CA-03-1190-1 (E.D.

Va. Aug. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished