Glover v. Hodges
Glover v. Hodges
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7640
TEKOA T. GLOVER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JIM HODGES, Governor of South Carolina; MARK SANFORD, Governor of the State of South Carolina; DRUANNE WHITE, Solicitor of the Tenth Circuit; GENE TAYLOR, Sheriff of Anderson County; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina; CHARLES CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA-03-2151)
Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 15, 2005
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tekoa T. Glover, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE, O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Tekoa T. Glover appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Glover v.
Hodges, No. CA-03-2151 (D.S.C. Sept. 9, 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished