Roy L. Williams appeals the district court order awarding summary judgment in favor of Alternative Behavioral Services on Williams’s claim of employment dis *543 crimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e — 2(a)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s thorough opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Alternative Behavioral Servs., No. CA-03-903 (E.D.Va. Sept. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED