Moore v. New Hanover County Gov
Moore v. New Hanover County Gov
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2185
JACKSON MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NEW HANOVER COUNTY GOVERNMENT; COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; COUNTY MANAGER; HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION; CARL A. BYRD; JOHN DAVIS; CYNTHIA STEVENS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever III, Magistrate Judge. (CA-03-195-DEV)
Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 4, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jackson Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Edwin Holt Moore, III, NEW HANOVER COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Jackson Moore appeals the magistrate judge’s order*
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000) (“Title VII”);
42 U.S.C. §§ 1981and
1985 (2000); and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection
Clause. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. New Hanover
County Gov’t, No. CA-03-195-DEV (E.D.N.C. Aug. 13, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
- 2 -
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished