Robinson v. Greenville
Robinson v. Greenville
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1844
WILLIAM G. ROBINSON, Lieutenant, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
CITY OF GREENVILLE; DAVID HENDERSON, Captain, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA-02-2533-26BI)
Submitted: February 7, 2005 Decided: March 1, 2005
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wm. Gary White, III, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant.
Deborah Casey Brown, GALLIVAN, WHITE & BOYD, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: William G. Robinson appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and granting summary judgment in favor of his employer and a former supervisor on his claims alleging race discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2000), retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a) (2000), and violations of his constitutional rights to equal protection and free speech in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court and the magistrate judge. See Robinson v. City of Greenville, No. CA-02-2533-26BI (D.S.C. Apr.
23, 2004 and May 26, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.