Floyd v. Brown

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Floyd v. Brown

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7986

ELIZABETH MARIE RUSHING FLOYD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID A. BROWN, an individual; ROBERT POTTER, an individual; RICHARD VOORHEES, an individual; THOMAS WIDMAN, an individual,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. H. Brent McKnight, District Judge. (CA-03-554-MCK)

Submitted: February 24, 2005 Decided: March 9, 2005

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elizabeth Marie Rushing Floyd, Appellant Pro Se. James Michael Sullivan, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Elizabeth Marie Rushing Floyd appeals the district

court’s order denying her motion to vacate the court’s September

24, 2004, order. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Floyd v. Brown, No. CA-03-554-MCK (W.D.N.C.

Nov. 22, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Reference

Status
Unpublished