United States v. Dandridge
United States v. Dandridge
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-4656
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
DON ANTONIO DANDRIDGE, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-03-119)
Submitted: February 18, 2005 Decided: March 8, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John P. Bradwell, SHORTRIDGE & SHORTRIDGE, P.C., Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, R. Lucas Hobbs, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Don Antonio Dandridge appeals from his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, he challenges the denial of his motions to suppress and to dismiss his indictment. We have reviewed the briefs and joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. (See J.A. at 17-19, 23, 38-48). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.