Tankard v. Bassett
Opinion
Julius Tankard seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Tankard has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Tankard v. Bassett, No. CA-04-641-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 26, 2004). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Julius TANKARD, Petitioner—Appellant, v. K.J. BASSETT, Warden, Keen Mountain Correctional Center, Respondent—Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished