U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

In Re: Doyle v.

In Re: Doyle v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 18, 2005 · Motz, Traxler, Duncan
123 F. App'x 141

In Re: Doyle v.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Brian Doyle petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly *142 delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. He also requests a “speedy hearing” in this court. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. We deny Doyle’s motion for a speedy hearing as moot. Accordingly, while we grant Doyle’s application to proceed in forma pauperis in this court, we deny his petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.