Garcia v. Brooks
Garcia v. Brooks
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7642
ESTEBAN GARCIA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
WARDEN BROOKS, Medical Administrator; MS MENDOZA, FCI Petersburg; DOCTOR ALLEN, FCI Petersburg, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-04-133-2)
Submitted: February 25, 2005 Decided: March 18, 2005
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Esteban Garcia, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Richard Leonard, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Esteban Garcia appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Garcia v. Brooks, No. CA-04-133- (E.D. Va. Sept. 27, 2004). We deny Garcia’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.