U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

United States v. Morrison

United States v. Morrison
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 16, 2005

United States v. Morrison

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7385

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

RONALD LEE MORRISON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-02-102)

Submitted: February 28, 2005 Decided: March 16, 2005

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Lee Morrison, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Ronald Lee Morrison seeks to appeal his conviction and sentence. In criminal cases, the defendant must file his notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, the district court may grant an extension of time to file of up to thirty days upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985).

The district court entered its judgment on March 12, 2003. Morrison dated his notice of appeal August 5, 2004.* Because Morrison failed to file a timely notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* We consider August 5, 2004, as the filing date pursuant to Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.