Nabil J. Asterbadi appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for correction of judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(a). We have reviewed the record and find that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion. See Kocher v. Dow Chem. Co., 132 F.3d 1225, 1229 (8th Cir. 1997) (stating review standard). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See CIT Group/Equip. Fin., Inc. v. Asterbadi, No. CA-93-857-1 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 24, 2004 & entered Sept. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED