Hunnicutt v. State of MD
Hunnicutt v. State of MD
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6171
CARNELL HUNNICUTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
WILLIAM SONDERVAN; FRANK SIZER, JR.; PATRICK CONROY; HAROLD AXELROD; JAMES PEGUESE; JON GALLEY; CAPTAIN REITZEL; CALVIN JONES; R. WILLS; T. L. RIGGLEMAN, being sued in their official and individual capacities; STATE OF MARYLAND, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; W. T. MULLEN; NANCY WILLIAMS; SHAVELLA WATKINS; MARY ANN SAAR, all being sued in their official and individual capacities; STATE OF MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-04- 2073-1-AMD)
Submitted: March 28, 2005 Decided: April 8, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carnell Hunnicutt, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM: Carnell Hunnicutt appeals a district court order granting the Defendants summary judgment and dismissing his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1(a) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and memorandum and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
See Hunnicutt v. Maryland Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-04-2073-1-AMD (D.
Md. Jan. 19, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.