U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

In Re: Betancourt v.

In Re: Betancourt v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 12, 2005 · Niemeyer, Traxler, King
125 F. App'x 515

In Re: Betancourt v.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wendell Edward Betancourt petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for recusal. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The district court denied Betancourt’s motion for recusal on December 13, 2004. Accordingly, because the district court has acted on Betancourt’s motion, we deny his mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.