Powell v. King
Powell v. King
128 F. App'x 315
Powell v. King
Opinion
Antonio V. Powell appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint in which he alleged deliberate indifference to his medical needs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Powell v. King, No. CA-03-102-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.