U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

United States v. Rolle

United States v. Rolle
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 6, 2005 · Duncan, King, Per Curiam, Williams
128 F. App'x 331

United States v. Rolle

Opinion

*332 PER CURIAM:

Troy Rolle appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2004) and his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Rolle, No. CR-97-608 (D.S.C. Jan. 6, 2005). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.