U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Smith v. Bureau of Prisons

Smith v. Bureau of Prisons
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 11, 2005

Smith v. Bureau of Prisons

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7862

FERNANDO M. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

BUREAU OF PRISONS; B. G. COMPTON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-03-662-7-SGW)

Submitted: April 29, 2005 Decided: May 11, 2005

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fernando M. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Fernando M. Smith, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge as adopted by the district court. See Smith v. Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-03-662-7-SGW (W.D. Va. Oct. 25, 2004).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.