Janet M. Deyerberg appeals the district court order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for fading to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Deyerberg v. Woodward, No. CA-04-1118-AW (D. Md. June 17, 2004). We deny Deyerberg’s motion for depositions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED