U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Stoner v. United States Marine Corps/MCCS

Stoner v. United States Marine Corps/MCCS
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 26, 2005 · Luttig, Michael, Motz, Per Curiam
132 F. App'x 462

Stoner v. United States Marine Corps/MCCS

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Margaret Stoner seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of longshore disability benefits pursuant to 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Stoner v. United States Marine Corps., No. 04-0245 (BRB Nov. 18, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.