U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Arora v. Inderneel

Arora v. Inderneel
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 24, 2005

Arora v. Inderneel

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1018

VASU D. ARORA, M.D., Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus SAHAI INDERNEEL; BUCHANAN GENERAL HOSPITAL; DOES 1 THROUGH 25, Defendants - Appellees,

and H. A. STREET, Party in Interest.

No. 05-1019

VASU D. ARORA, M.D.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus MANSOOR HYDER; APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL; DOES 1 THROUGH 25,

Defendants - Appellees, and H. A. STREET, Party in Interest.

No. 05-1020

VASU D. ARORA, M.D.,

Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

ABU S. MATIN, M.D.; DOES 1 THROUGH 25; JOHN DOE,

Defendants - Appellees, and H. A. STREET, Party in Interest.

05-1021

VASU D. ARORA, M.D.,

Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KAMRAN FASIH, M.D.; APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL; DOES 1 THROUGH 25, Defendants - Appellees, and

- 2 - H. A. STREET, Party in Interest.

No. 05-1022

VASU D. ARORA, M.D.,

Plaintiff - Appellant, versus AMJAD HUSAIN, M.D.; BUCHANAN GENERAL HOSPITAL; DOES 1 THROUGH 25, Defendants - Appellees, and H. A. STREET, Party in Interest.

No. 05-1023

VASU D. ARORA, M.D., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOSE A. ALEMPARTE, M.D.; BUCHANAN GENERAL HOSPITAL; M. J. THAKKER; TRI STATE CLINIC; SPARKS MEDICAL CENTER; DOES 1 THROUGH 25, Defendants - Appellees, and

- 3 - H. A. STREET, Party in Interest.

No. 05-1024

VASU D. ARORA, M.D., Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus RANA TABASSUM, M.D.; APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL; DOES 1 THROUGH 25, Defendants - Appellees, and H. A. STREET, Party in Interest.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-30-1; CA-04-31-1; CA-04-32-1; CA-04-33-1; CA-04-34- 1; CA-04-35-1; CA-04-36-1)

Submitted: May 19, 2005 Decided: May 24, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vasu D. Arora, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Ralph Scott, Jr., STREET, STREET, STREET, SCOTT & BOWMAN, Grundy, Virginia; William Morris Moffett, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abington, Virginia; Kimberly W.

- 4 - Daniel, HANCOCK, DANIEL, JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Glen Allen, Virginia; Robert Brooks Altizer, GILLESPIE, HART, ALTIZER & WHITESELL, Tazewell, Virginia; Bryan Grimes Williams Creasy, JOHNSON, AYERS & MATTHEWS, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

- 5 - PER CURIAM: In these seven appeals, Vasu D. Arora appeals from the district court's orders dismissing his actions in which he asserted claims for breach of contract and tortious interference with a contract and enjoining him from filing further actions in the district court pro se without prior permission from the court. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Arora v. Inderneel, No. CA-04-30-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2004); Arora v. Hyder, No. CA-04-31-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2004); Arora v. Matin, No. CA-04-32-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2004); Arora v. Fasih, No. CA-04-33-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2004); Arora v. Husain, No. CA-04-34-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2004); Arora v. Alemparte, No. CA-04-35-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2004); Arora v. Tabassum, No. CA-04-36-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2004); see In re March, 988 F.2d 498, 500 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 6 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.