Charles L. Lewis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lewis v. Fahey, No. CA-05-43 (E.D.Va. Jan. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be *909 fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED