U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Jordan v. Gonzales

Jordan v. Gonzales
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 14, 2005

Jordan v. Gonzales

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7999

AMOS HENRY JORDAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States of America, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-126-2-20AJ)

Submitted: June 9, 2005 Decided: June 14, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Amos Henry Jordan, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Amos Henry Jordan, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jordan v. Ashcroft, CA-04-126-2-20AJ (D.S.C., filed Oct. 29, 2004; entered Nov. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.