U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

In Re: Horton v.

In Re: Horton v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 14, 2005

In Re: Horton v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1347

In Re: JOHN D. HORTON, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (MC-04-13)

Submitted: June 9, 2005 Decided: June 14, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John D. Horton, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: John D. Horton petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his petition for expungement of records. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously. We grant Horton’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.