United States v. Jordan
United States v. Jordan
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6269
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
DANNY ANTONIO JORDAN, SR., Defendant - Appellant.
No. 05-6288
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
BRANDI LATOYA JORDAN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CR-01-70031-6-001; CR-01-70031-6-002)
Submitted: June 23, 2005 Decided: June 29, 2005
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Danny Antonio Jordan, Sr., Brandi LaToya Jordan, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Danny Antonio Jordan, Sr., and Brandi LaToya Jordan appeal the district court’s order denying their motion to amend the judgment order entered on November 5, 2003. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Jordan, Nos. CR-01-70031-6-001; CR-01- 70031-6-002 (W.D. Va. Jan. 26, 2005). We grant the Government’s motion to file its informal brief out of time, grant Brandi Jordan’s motion to amend her informal brief, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.