U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Hill v. Lee County Corr Inst

Hill v. Lee County Corr Inst
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 26, 2005

Hill v. Lee County Corr Inst

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6511

CURTIS R. HILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

LEE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; A.J.

PADULA; D. MITCHELL; JAMES E. SLIGH, JR., Division Director Classification and Inmate Records, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-05-693-6)

Submitted: July 14, 2005 Decided: July 26, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis R. Hill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Curtis R. Hill appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hill v. County Corr. Inst., No. CA-05-693-6 (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.