U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Moorehead v. Bledsoe

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 3, 2005 · King, Gregory, Shedd

140 F. App'x 493

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Byron H. Moorehead appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Bivens * complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Moorehead v. Bledsoe, No. CA-05-59-GEC (WD.Va. Feb. 2, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). Moorehead filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), which the district court properly construed as a Bivens action.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.