Nelson v. Hamilton
Nelson v. Hamilton
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6333
RICKY DONNELL NELSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
LARRY K. HAMILTON; TOD RUNYON; VALERIE CARTER; OFFICER SMALL; LIEUTENANT WETHERHEAD; LIEUTENANT RANDLE; LIEUTENANT CHALLOUGHLCZISE; MARY JANE VIVEROS; WILLIAM DANFORD, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-03-741-2)
Submitted: July 13, 2005 Decided: August 2, 2005
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky Donnell Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Wayne Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Ricky Donnell Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nelson v. Hamilton, No. CA-03-741-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.