U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Green v. Mecklenburg Jail

Green v. Mecklenburg Jail
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 2, 2005

Green v. Mecklenburg Jail

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6160

MICHAEL DUCHELLE GREEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

MECKLENBURG COUNTY JAIL, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-04-754-3)

Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 2, 2005

Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Duchelle Green, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Michael Duchelle Green appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act and also construed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). For the first time on appeal, Green alleges that he sustained an injury from a fall that could have been avoided had he received adequate medical care for his back. Green did not make this allegation in his complaint filed with the district court. Arguments not properly presented to the district court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.

See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See Green v. Mecklenburg County Jail, No. CA-04-754-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.