William N. Odom, Jr., appeals the magistrate judge’s order * granting summary judgment in favor of Odom’s employer on his retaliation claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Odom v. Potter, No. CA-03-913-3 (D.S.C. filed Dec. 17, 2004 & entered Dec. 20, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED