Juan Valdez appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment and dismissing Valdez’ petition for writ of habeas corpus, which the court construed as a petition for writ of mandamus under 28 U.S.C. § 1361 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Valdez v. Dewalt, No. CA-04-3391-8-DKC (D.Md. Feb. 10, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED