U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

McCracken v. Natale

McCracken v. Natale
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 8, 2005 · Niemeyer, Williams, Hamilton
141 F. App'x 139

McCracken v. Natale

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ted Aaron McCracken appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge granting defendant Natale’s motion for summary judgment, and imposing sanctions under Fed.R.CivJP. 11. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McCracken v. Natale, No. CA-04-50-5 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.