Grice v. Barnhart
Grice v. Barnhart
Opinion
Clarence E. Grice appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and affirming the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Grice v. Barnhart, No. CA-03-4054-0-25 (D.S.C. Feb. 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.