United States v. Hampton
United States v. Hampton
141 F. App'x 225
United States v. Hampton
Opinion
Kenneth Marion Hampton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Hampton, No. CR-00-616 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 4, 2005 & entered Apr. 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.