U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Schoonover v. Randolph County Sheriff's Office

Schoonover v. Randolph County Sheriff's Office
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 25, 2005 · Widener, Williams, Michael
142 F. App'x 165

Schoonover v. Randolph County Sheriff's Office

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joel Bruce Schoonover appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Schoonover v. Randolph County Sheriff’s Office, No. CA-04-35-2 (N.D.W.Va. Apr. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.