Glen Mark, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion *195 for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). Our review of the district court’s opinion adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny as unnecessary Mark’s motion for a certificate of appealability, grant his motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * See United States v. Mark, Nos. CR-89-263-G; CA-04-500-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED