Irick v. United States
Irick v. United States
142 F. App'x 758
Irick v. United States
Opinion
Freddie Lee Irick appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Irick v. United States, No. CA-97-567-5 (D.S.C. filed Feb. 25, 2005 & entered Feb. 28, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.