Charles Edward Scrivens, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error because the claim is foreclosed by our recent decision in Yi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 412 F.3d 526 (4th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court. See Scrivens v. Bledsoe, No. CA-04-725-7 (W.D.Va. Dec. 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED