U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Broadnax v. Washington Mutual

Broadnax v. Washington Mutual
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 20, 2005

Broadnax v. Washington Mutual

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1180

LISA ANNETTE BROADNAX, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FA, Homeside Lending, Incorporated, Defendant - Appellee, and

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant.

No. 05-1607

LISA ANNETTE BROADNAX, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FA, Homeside Lending, Incorporated, Defendant - Appellee, and

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-04-693; CA-04-693-2)

Submitted: August 31, 2005 Decided: September 20, 2005

Before LUTTIG, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lisa Annette Broadnax, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Roy Zahn, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lisa Broadnax appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her civil action arising out of a foreclosure sale. Our review of the record and the opinions of the district court discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Broadnax v. Washington Mutual Bank, Nos. CA-04-693; CA-04-693-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 4, 2005; May 20, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.