U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Thomas v. Warden

Thomas v. Warden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 30, 2005

Thomas v. Warden

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6623

KEITH THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

WARDEN, Federal Detention Center in Alexandria, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 05-6624

KEITH THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

JOHN DOE, standby counsel of the 20th highjacker Mr. Moussaoui, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-05-247-1; CA-05-265-1)

Submitted: September 27, 2005 Decided: September 30, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Keith Thomas appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Thomas v. Warden, CA-05-247-1 (E.D. Va., Mar. 16, 2005); Thomas v. Doe, CA-05-265-1 (E.D. Va., Mar. 22, 2005). We deny Thomas’ motion for injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.