U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2005

Kirby v. Genesis Properties

Kirby v. Genesis Properties
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 29, 2005

Kirby v. Genesis Properties

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1525

KATHLEEN R. KIRBY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

GENESIS PROPERTIES AND HUNT INVESTMENTS; MICHAEL C. HUNT, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-04-792)

Submitted: September 27, 2005 Decided: September 29, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kathleen R. Kirby, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Garrett Hill, MEYER, GOERGEN & MARRS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Kathleen R. Kirby appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Kirby v. Genesis Properties & Hunt Investments, CA-04-792 (E.D. Va. Apr. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.