Heily v. US Dept of Commerce
Heily v. US Dept of Commerce
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1440
DANIEL E. HEILY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; JOHNNIE FRAZIER, Inspector General, Office of Inspector General, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-04-1070)
Submitted: September 27, 2005 Decided: September 29, 2005
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel E. Heily, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Jason Mikolashek, Brian Eugene Bentley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Daniel E. Heily appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action seeking relief under the Freedom of Information Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Heily v. United States Dep’t of Commerce, No. CA-04-1070 (E.D. Va. Apr. 5, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.