Wendell E. Betancourt appeals for the second time the district court’s December 13, 2004, order denying his motion for recusal. We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal as duplicative because this court previously disposed of his first appeal from the same order. See United States v. Betancourt, 128 Fed. Appx. 335 (4th Cir. 2005) (unpublished). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED